Choosing a watch is an important decision that requires a lot of research and time. Will you choose design over functionality? Or do you prefer extra features that other watches don’t have?
In any case, we think that a good watch needs to have it all. That’s why, today, we are going to talk about two of Casio’s most popular watches gw9400 and g9300 to decide which one is a better buy.
Casio G Shock Rangeman vs. Mudman
Atomic Time Keeping
Both watches have a similar look and feel to them thanks to their black band and display. In fact, they even have the same red accents which highlight the important areas around the display. The similarities continue even when talking about their sizes, as both have a diameter of 5.4 centimeters. However, the Casio Mudman is a bit thicker, with a thickness of 19 millimeters compared to the G Shock Rangeman’s 18.2 mm.
The design of the side buttons and the width of the band are the only noticeable differences between these watches. On the one hand, the Rangeman’s band is 22 millimeters wide and its buttons are grey, similar to the watch’s screws. On the other hand, the Mudman has a 19-millimeter band with black buttons that blend in well with the design.
It’s really hard to choose between watches that are similar in looks and size. Instead, you will have to look at the other features to help you decide which one to choose.btw check out watch for cops here
It comes as no surprise that both of these Casio watches are made from durable materials. That means they are resistant to shock and low temperatures. In fact, you can wear either of the two in environments with temperatures as low as 10°F.
In addition to that, both watches are scratch-resistant and have their dial windows made from mineral glass. That is important because mineral glass is up to seven times more durable than the acrylic glass used in most watches. You shouldn’t have any reason to worry about scratching your brand new watch.
It’s clear that both watches are incredibly durable, which makes them useful in most environments and job types. If durability is all that matters to you, then both the Casio G Shock Rangeman and Mudman are the perfect watches.
Solar Power and Battery
When it comes to solar power and battery, both watches take the first place, as their specifications are incredibly similar. Pick either of them and you should never need to worry about changing the battery, as long as you don’t live in complete darkness. But if you ever wish to change it, the Rangeman uses a CLB3032 battery while the Mudman uses a CTL1616 battery.
Most watches have a world time feature, allowing you to know the time in other time zones, and Casio watches are no different. Both G Shock Rangeman and Mudman will show you the time across a range of time zones.
However, the Mudman doesn’t support atomic timekeeping, which means that you will have to update the timezone manually. On the other hand, the Rangeman automatically updates your time zone in an accurate manner. Thus, choosing the Rangeman means that you won’t have to constantly worry about not remembering to update the time.
Atomic watches have a receiver inside them that receive special radio transmissions at a specific hour of the day. This signal contains up to date information about date and time. For example, it can update the watch for daylight saving time, meaning that you don’t have to do it manually.
As previously mentioned, the Mudman doesn’t support atomic timekeeping, making the Rangeman the clear winner in this case.
For some people, carrying a physical compass around when traveling is a real hassle. But luckily, both the Rangeman and Mudman have their own digital compass. All you need to do in order to access it is push a button on the side of the watch. While the compass is similar, each watch has its own design when it comes to the compass.
The Mudman has a digital compass dial that points to the north depending on the direction you are facing. Unlike it, the Rangeman requires you to hold the watch parallel to your chest in order to display the direction you are facing. But despite that small difference, both compasses are easy to use and extremely accurate. This function is great for mountaineers, military workers, and travelers.
If unique features are all that matter to you, then both the Casio G Shock Rangeman and the Mudman deliver.
The former offers precise sunrise and sunset data thanks to its atomic timekeeping feature. You will receive the sunrise/sunset data as long as your watch is able to receive the timekeeping signal.
The latter incorporates a moon phase calendar, which helps you stay up to date with the phases of the moon. Knowing all about the moon phases is important because the tide depends on them. For example, the tides are highest during a full moon, which means that the fish tend to bite. Because of that, fishermen will surely enjoy the Mudman’s moon phase calendar.
Rangeman vs. Mudman — Who Is the Winner?
On the one hand, the Casio G Shock Rangeman offers everything from durability to atomic timekeeping. The sunrise and sunset data are a welcome addition to an already complete package. However, because of that, the price is a bit higher than other watches out there, the Mudman included. But if the cost is not a problem, then you should definitely choose the Rangeman.
On the other hand, the Mudman is a cheaper alternative that has similar features to the Rangeman. Although it lacks the atomic timekeeping, the Mudman is still a great watch worthy of praise. The moon phase calendar is the extra feature that may help you decide if this is the right watch for you. If you are looking for a cheaper yet durable and versatile watch, then the Mudman is perfect for you.
It’s really hard to choose between these two models as they are extremely similar in both looks and features. As such, the decision depends on your personal preferences and requirements. we chose rangeman as the winner